The AI Adoption Gap for Authors

The AI adoption gap for authors

J.D. Lasica (Founder)
December 4, 2025

What new data reveals about authorsโ€™ attitudes about AI

Ready to see how your own manuscript holds up? Try the free Marlowe Basic Report

question, doubt, problem, question mark, confusion, thinking, decision, confused, woman, copy space, question, question, question mark, confused, confused, confused, confused, confused

The debate over whether and when to use AI in creative writing isnโ€™t going away anytime soon. Rather than lining up on one side or the other, itโ€™s more productive to examine how authorsโ€™ habits are actually evolvingโ€”and now we have solid data to inform that discussion.

A new study commissioned by Gotham Ghostwriters examines AI and the Writing Profession. The introduction frames the question in almost existential terms: โ€œIs AI a powerful productivity tool or an existential threat to our field? A plagiarism machine or an incredible advance in human-computer collaboration?โ€

While thereโ€™s no widespread consensus, the study reveals a predictable pattern: writers familiar with AI tools are much more open to incorporating them into their workflows, while those philosophically opposed remain firmly resistant.

Whatโ€™s surprising is how many fiction authors claim to be sitting on the sidelines. Letโ€™s examine the results.

The survey collected responses from 291 fiction authors and 1,190 writing professionals, including content marketers, communications specialists, technical writers, and journalists. Respondents acknowledged that AI represents both threat and opportunityโ€”not an inconsistency, but a realistic recognition of the disruption underway.

Two charts particularly stood out. First, hereโ€™s a snapshot of AI usage frequency among various writer groups (fiction authors werenโ€™t included in this breakdown): chart2 Among writing professionals who use AI for the widest variety of tasks, 92% report increased productivity and 59% say they produce higher-quality results. Most striking: professional writers using AI most frequently earn $47,000 more annually than non-users.

Thatโ€™s a significant gap. While this doesnโ€™t prove causation, it suggests the most productive writers are leveraging AI most effectively.

Fiction authors: More hesitant at the start

Now letโ€™s focus on fiction authors. (Their detailed breakdown begins on page 23 of the report.) Only 42% of surveyed fiction authors report using AI at least occasionally. (The remainder likely do but donโ€™t recognize it or wonโ€™t acknowledge it.) Among those who embrace AI, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive: 60% say it improves their writing quality and 87% report productivity gains. The most popular tools are familiar names: ChatGPT, Claude, ProWritingAid, and Google Gemini.

chart1

The 58% who claim never or rarely to use AI in their creative process raises questions. Do they genuinely avoid AI for researchโ€”a requirement in nearly all novels? Do they refuse AI image generation for blog posts, marketing materials, Facebook ads, or book blurbs? When querying agents, do they spend days manually compiling lengthy synopses or chapter-by-chapter outlines? Do they demand their book designers avoid AI entirely when creating cover art?

I suspect many authors are intimidated by fierce blowback from a small but vocal minority of readersโ€”the ones who flood Facebook comments and social media with all-caps tirades against anything AI-related.

Theyโ€™re a noisy bunch, but their numbers will dwindle as certain AI applications become standard practice in publishing.

The real question isnโ€™t whether to use AI, but where and when.

A partner, not a substitute

According to the survey, only 11% of fiction authors use AI to generate text for their works. Far more common applications include brainstorming, research, and grammar assistanceโ€”specifically for title ideas, outline generation, identifying continuity errors and plot holes, and creating visuals for blog posts or advertisements.

This aligns with what weโ€™ve observed at Authors A.I.: The vast majority of authors want an AI critique partner and research assistant, not an AI ghostwriter.

As the report concludes: “For writers, itโ€™s clear that the most intensive AI users are becoming more productive and generating more opportunities and, in some cases, higher incomes. Writers who use AI less intensively would benefit from leaning into the opportunities it appears to be creating.”

Itโ€™s time for authors to embrace these tools. The waterโ€™s just fine.


Is your manuscript ready for readers?

Marlowe analyzes your fiction for pacing, dialogue, character development, and more โ€” in minutes. Your story stays entirely yours. Marlowe reads, never rewrites. Try the free Marlowe Basic Reportย 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted